Tom Maras: Are Woodbridge taxpayers getting their money’s worth?

by Woodbridge InJersey on May 28th | Email

EDITOR'S NOTE: The following commentary is by Tom E. Maras, a resident of Fords. We welcome your responses.

In the next 18 months or so, Woodbridge voters may never have a better chance to improve cost efficiencies and productivity in our schools and in our town government. If we fail at this opportunity, we will suffer the cost (is $9 million enough?) of satisfying the lust a few have for “green fields of open space" and our conversion into "McTaxBurgers" will be ensured.

Even Council President Jim Major admitted: "we (the council) are not continuing the status quo." On a positive note, I commended the council for seeing the need to change their old spend and tax ways. I fully support their effort and trust we (the people) will remain, like the council, pro-active in ensuring our children, our seniors and our community at large are getting the best return on our investments.

As business administrator Robert Landolfi has pointed out on a few occasions, government does not operate on a P&L (profit and loss) or ROI (return on investment basis), hence the spend and tax mentality. Private company owners and their employees do, however, know those terms. Let us ensure those terms also become part of our local and state governments’ vocabulary.

The town council on May 11, canceling the latest $75,000 “study” of the Fords Theater (second in 2 and a half years, both of which were approved by councilmen Major and Rick Dalina in their positions on the council and the Redevelopment Agency) is a start. It is hoped that CME, one of the township’s favorite consultants, might rebate the unused portion of a study, which was due to be completed in July. If they do rebate anything, it will be interesting to see what the taxpayers get for the monies spent. After the first study, Caroline Ehrlich, the executive director of the Redevelopment Agency, the mayor and Councilman Dalina all said some time ago the theater was most likely not worth saving. Of course, spending another $75,000 to re-verify those earlier conclusions was worth it, at least to CME.

The Woodbridge Dog Park is still under study by yet another township consultant. The estimated study cost $60,0000. Once that study is done and the township finally gets state Department of Environmental Protection approval to fix and use the dog park, (cost to be advised), it will be a place fit for our canines. Maybe, the dog owners will get the restrooms Councilman Charles Kenny promised a few years back before the DEP problems. At least those that are privileged enough to have gotten one of the 28 new taxpayer-subsidized boat slips at the recently completed, or almost completed, Sewaren Marina have a porta-john!

Fortunately, councilmen Greg Bedard and Robert Luban have recently shown the courage to vote NO to some of Johnny Mac’s schemes. And Mr. Luban missing a last minute call for a council vote by the mayor, while out of state, is nothing for which Mr. Luban needs to apologize. He was already on record as being against rushing to eminent domain tactics against the owners of the Colonia Country Club. Councilmen Dalina and Kenny are also given kudos for abstaining from the BOE budget voting, owing to their self-professed possible conflict of interests.

It will be most interesting to see how the township’s takeover of the Community Center’s skating rinks and food service fares. Certainly more people on the township’s payroll helps in November elections. So does delayed municipal budgets, until after the voting!

One can only imagine the beauty and profits that might come from a 18-hole golf course in Colonia. Or, will it eventually be a 9-hole boondoggle, Mr. Mayor?