Red-light camera on Route 1 in Woodbridge catches more than 1,000 drivers in 3 weeks

1-2-3 Red light! Woodbridge police will use a camera to issue tickets for drivers who run red lights at the Route 1 and Avenel Street intersection.
WOODBRIDGE, NJ – Run a red light after Aug. 3 on Route 1 at Avenel Street and expect a $140 ticket in your mailbox.
The intersection is the only township location approved by the state for red-light camera monitoring. Edison, Linden, New Brunswick, Piscataway and Roselle Park are among 20 municipalities since 2008 to have also received the green light to install the devices.
Woodbridge’s cameras have already snared 1,030 possible violators during the warning grace period that began July 5 and ends next week, officials said. Violators caught by the cameras do not get points added to their licenses.
Township spokesman John Hagerty said the intersection is among the most accident prone corners in the township. From June 2005 to June of this year, the police department counted 139 accidents here, including 21 mishaps with pedestrians and four fatalities.
TAKE OUR POLL: Are red-light cameras a good idea?
“We did not go looking at this intersection for a red light traffic camera from a revenue perspective,” Hagerty said. “We’re looking to make that intersection safer. It’s been a concern of the Township Council for many years.”
The 2008 state law that authorized cameras requires that all images of potential violations be reviewed by a trained police officer.
“No warning or violation will be issued unless it is clearly a red light and the vehicle is clearly through the intersection,” Hagerty said.
Critics of red light cameras, such as the National Motorists Association, say the cameras can cause accidents when worried drivers slam their breaks too soon. A 2005 study by the Federal Highway Administration found that red light cameras reduced right-angle collisions but increased rear-end crashes.
Other research is favorable. A 2004 study by the University College London, for example, showed a drop in fatalities at monitored intersections in Great Britain.
The cameras in Woodbridge were installed by Arizona-based American Traffic Solutions at no initial cost. The company will collect $4,750 a month, Hagerty said.













Sal Z 4:42 pm on July 27, 2010 Permalink
I think the red light cameras are a good idea but tell me WHY they could not give the camera installation contract to a company in New Jersey?
Sam 7:12 pm on July 27, 2010 Permalink
That intersection is very difficult. One side (the fire station side) has a left turn signal, the other does not. It is very hard to make the left. There should be a left turn arrow both ways.
MOBBuster 8:11 am on July 28, 2010 Permalink
I gather the company is getting a commission? I smell Mob..
R.Lubo 11:24 am on July 28, 2010 Permalink
$140 x 1000 =$140.000 in 3 weeks by computers. This not revenuing? who’s kidding who?
At least admit the scam, and use the revenue to pay for smeething useful like SCHOOLS! Save the taxpayer.
EB Ron
Joanne 11:43 am on July 28, 2010 Permalink
So glad for the grace period because I could have sworn that last week I went through a yellow and saw a quick flas as I was crossing the highway.
I have this sinking feeling that the town will get more than its share;) Its Woodbridge people.
Walter Ryan 1:17 pm on July 28, 2010 Permalink
Any ideas on how to get these removed ? Legally of course!! :-)
simplemines 5:11 pm on August 4, 2010 Permalink
What does this mean?
“The cameras in Woodbridge were installed by Arizona-based American Traffic Solutions at no initial cost. The company will collect $4,750 a month, Hagerty said.”
So it’s going to cost nothing, or it’s going to cost $4,750?? Which is it? And if it’s going to cost $4,750, when does that start? How much is a ticket for running a red light? it’d be nice if we could find that out so we can figure out if taxpayers will get stuck footing the bill for this scheme (you know, like we always do.)