Gardner: Woodbridge should hire more cops, change salary and benefits
EDITOR'S NOTE: Ken Gardner, a Democrat, is a fire commissioner in Fire District 1 for Woodbridge and Sewaren and former president of the Township Council.
History has shown us many times that crime increases in a bad economy. Since my time as Council President I have supported a 200 member police force. At that time we made the initiative a priority as Councilman to budget sufficient funds to increase the force.
Last year Mayor John E. McCormac called for a force of up to 220 men. While conservatives urged budget cuts, I supported the Mayor’s hiring. This subject was covered in the home News Tribune on September 2, 2010 when McCormac’s administration said “The only department that has bolstered its ranks is the police force.”
I believe we still need a similar number of officers. McCormac has reduced the number of officers by at least 11 with the potential of another 25 retirements.
The HNT also editorialized on the subject but a recent InJersey posting does not take into consideration what was said just months ago. In addition, on December 9, 2009 in the HNT the mayor said, “This week the township welcomed nine recruits to the force. The mayor says he wants to slowly add to the 212-member force until it's 220.”
The reality is that the economy is still very bad and our community is easily accessible through the multitude of major highways to criminals. Lowering the number of officers is not acceptable.
I commend the mayor for looking at a restructuring of the Police Department. If that helps us put more police on the streets than it is worthy of consideration. However, the portion that gives the mayor direct control over the police director and eliminates the chief is one that needs tremendous oversight from the town council and the public. I do not say this as any type of personal attack on the mayor. Rather, it is a major change in public policy to give any mayor power that is certainly different and some of which had been vested in a chief whose term was not controlled by political elections.
Firstly, no director should be hired until the chief retires.
Secondly, I would encourage the mayor to consider a reorganization and or salary reduction in his senior administration to find funds to cover police salaries. While that would require sacrifice on their parts the small loss of income will not affect the necessities of life. Rather, it may require one less vacation this year. Again, this is not a personal attack on any of the administrator’s performance.
Thirdly, administration positions that are of a political nature should be eliminated instead of police.
These recommendations are a necessity of keeping our town safe which will benefit all for years to come.
In addition, the mayor should immediately work with the union to make changes to any new police officers salaries and long-term benefits. I appreciate those who have the courage to put their life on the line to protect us. However, it has been proven that the revenue that comes in from taxes is insufficient to cover the long-term salary and benefits provided in the current contract. It is unfair to new officers to make promises we can’t keep. This idea will be real reform that has been overlooked.
Current employees are much different. Politicians made an agreement with the police officers who have in turn made life’s financial decisions based on those contracts. We need to do everything possible to honor their contracts. It is also fair to note while the situation is not the fault of the officers, it is not the fault of the public who will be taxed to cover the bill either.
These ideas are respectfully submitted in the spirit of debate to make Woodbridge better. In the end that will benefit & protect all of us. Not divide us.
I am confident that as we move forward the public will continue to support the police. Open minds are needed by all to help us get through the worst economy of our lifetime. I look forward to working with the mayor to address these issues.













Tom Maras 5:58 pm on February 10, 2011 Permalink
“Where will the Political Winds Blow Him Next”!
It was just a short time ago that Ken Gardener tried to get the then Council
President, Jim Major, to accept Ken’s change of political party declaration,
at a town council meeting. While Mr. Major refused to accept the
declaration at the meeting, Mr. Gardner took great care to ensure his failed
attempt to hand the declaration to the Township Clerk was captured on the
TV-35 camera and noted by the press.
For many, Ken’s change in political party came as no surprise. Several
members of the Republican Party were told by Ken Gardner, weeks before the
council meeting, of his plan to change his party affiliation, in order to
challenge John McCormac in the primary’s, as a Democrat. Since that time,
Ken’s seems to be wrestling with the questioned posed in William
Shakespeare’s opening soliloquy from Hamlet: “To be or not to be…”
For someone that verbally claims he is still considering a primary challenge
against John McCormac, his statement: “I look forward to working with the
mayor to address these issues.” (per his February 9, post on
Woodbridge.injersey.com) seems inconsistent, with that ambition. In fact,
except for his statement about our police needing our support, which I
totally agree with, I cannot determine how he plans to help the Mayor.
Reading Ken’s article leaves me very confused, as to his true motivations.
It’s clear he doesn’t want a Director of Police, at least not for now. His
“First” and “Third” recommendations seem to be redundant. If the Mayor and
our current Chief of Police feel they can put more officers on the street,
without increasing the number of officer in the department, why shouldn’t
they take that approach? As Mr. Gardner correctly pointed out, these are
very difficult times. If the Mayor, in consultation with the Chief and other
senior officers, feel a department of, approximately, 197 officers will give
the township the protection it needs, I certainly endorse that plan.
Assuming the plan to build the police department to 220 officers is delayed,
until the township can afford the increase, the township could, perhaps,
realize $1,610,000.00 (23 officers X an guesstimated $70,000.00 in salaries
and benefits, per officer)in cost reduction. As someone you has challenged
the McCormac Administration to make such changes, I, as stated above,
commend and support the Mayor for such an initiative. However, I find Ken’s
statement: “Lowering the number of officers is not acceptable” ignores the
reality of the township’s current financial situation, but yet he states:
“…it has been proven that the revenue that comes in from taxes is
insufficient to cover the long-term salary and benefits provided in the
current contract.” Just how much of the Administration’s staff and salaries
does Mr. Gardner feel would have to be cut to save $1,610,000.00?
When it comes to Ken’s suggestion: “… the mayor should immediately work
with the union to make changes to any new police officers salaries and
long-term benefits, has he forgotten the Mayor just failed to get few, if
any concessions, with the police union and went with a 6.75% increase over
three years. How does Ken suggest the Mayor get the union to change the
contract for “new” officers? Even if that was accomplished, how much would
be saved now?
Based on his writing, Mr. Gardner’s mayoral, future employment and/or
political ambitions remain something of an enigma. It does seem he is
trying to be all things to all people, while offending none. So while his
platform, so to speak, reminds me of a floating dock in choppy waters, it is
hoped the Mayor will tell Ken; Thanks for the offer of help, but no thanks!
Even I recognize John McCormac has enough to worry about, without that kind
of help.
Does anyone know Ken’s position on the various Fire Districts budgets?
donaldnelsen 3:47 pm on February 11, 2011 Permalink
Why would anyone attempt to present a voter registration change record to the council president or any sitting council person for that matter?
All you have to do is send it to the municipal or county clerk and it is a done deal.